You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If JuliaDB is an abandoned project (it appears to be, due to the lack of development in the past few years, and the exceedingly old dependency versions), what is the alternative that the community is supposed to be using?
Is the standard in julia now to simply use Dagger.jl for everything?
It would be great if we had a standard that was as well accepted and developed as something like SQLite, that has the attractive features of JuliaDB.
I have tried out DuckDB with hopes to find out-of-core and parallel query capability, but it fell short of that on groupby operations, unfortunately.
I was excited for JuliaDB, but it seems to be only compatible with the julia of the distant past.
(@v1.7) pkg> add JuliaDB
Updating registry at `~/.julia/registries/General.toml`
Resolving package versions...
ERROR: Unsatisfiable requirements detected for package DataFrames [a93c6f00]:
DataFrames [a93c6f00] log:
├─possible versions are:0.11.7-1.3.2 or uninstalled
├─restricted to versions * by an explicit requirement, leaving only versions 0.11.7-1.3.2
├─restricted by compatibility requirements with DuckDB [d2f5444f] to versions:1.2.0-1.3.2
│ └─DuckDB [d2f5444f] log:
│ ├─possible versions are:0.2.3-0.2.9 or uninstalled
│ └─restricted to versions * by an explicit requirement, leaving only versions 0.2.3-0.2.9
└─restricted by compatibility requirements with PooledArrays [2dfb63ee] to versions:0.11.7-0.22.7 or uninstalled — no versions left
└─PooledArrays [2dfb63ee] log:
├─possible versions are:0.3.0-1.4.1 or uninstalled
└─restricted by compatibility requirements with JuliaDB [a93385a2] to versions:0.4.1-0.5.3
└─JuliaDB [a93385a2] log:
├─possible versions are:0.9.0-0.13.1 or uninstalled
└─restricted to versions * by an explicit requirement, leaving only versions 0.9.0-0.13.1
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, JuliaDB is effectively abandoned and not receiving necessary maintenance.
Dagger's DTable is in the process of gaining support for the DataFrames mini-language, disk caching, and more as Dagger evolves, so yes, I'd say that Dagger is the alternative to switch to.
If JuliaDB is an abandoned project (it appears to be, due to the lack of development in the past few years, and the exceedingly old dependency versions), what is the alternative that the community is supposed to be using?
Is the standard in julia now to simply use Dagger.jl for everything?
It would be great if we had a standard that was as well accepted and developed as something like SQLite, that has the attractive features of JuliaDB.
I have tried out DuckDB with hopes to find out-of-core and parallel query capability, but it fell short of that on groupby operations, unfortunately.
I was excited for JuliaDB, but it seems to be only compatible with the julia of the distant past.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: