Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ecosystem wide performance benchmarks #10

Open
rafaqz opened this issue Feb 13, 2025 · 5 comments
Open

Ecosystem wide performance benchmarks #10

rafaqz opened this issue Feb 13, 2025 · 5 comments

Comments

@rafaqz
Copy link
Member

rafaqz commented Feb 13, 2025

It would be good to have cross package performance benchmarks here, similar to testing in #9

It would be very nice to have a github bot that runs these benchmarks from a comment @JuliaGeoBot benchmark in a branch of any package so we can run it when we need, but not in all CI.

@evetion
Copy link
Member

evetion commented Feb 13, 2025

Benchmarks for package integrations right? I assume Rasters/GeoDataFrames want their own (performance) tests?

@asinghvi17
Copy link
Member

It could also be nice to do expanded vector-benchmark or raster-benchmark here, for example, at least to compare with a baseline number from a previous commit

@asinghvi17
Copy link
Member

We should have both - package specific performance tests as well as ecosystem wide that are held in Geo.jl

The problem is that we often want to investigate scaling dynamics across numbers of geometries or vertices or something, that capability doesn't exist in the ecosystem so I want to build that first...

@rafaqz
Copy link
Member Author

rafaqz commented Feb 13, 2025

I guess I meant things like benchmarking Rasters and GeometryOps functions against all the geometry backends for GeoDataFrames

@asinghvi17
Copy link
Member

True, that could go here, and we could actually move a bunch of stuff here from my old GeometryOps pr

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants