-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ecosystem wide performance benchmarks #10
Comments
Benchmarks for package integrations right? I assume Rasters/GeoDataFrames want their own (performance) tests? |
It could also be nice to do expanded |
We should have both - package specific performance tests as well as ecosystem wide that are held in Geo.jl The problem is that we often want to investigate scaling dynamics across numbers of geometries or vertices or something, that capability doesn't exist in the ecosystem so I want to build that first... |
I guess I meant things like benchmarking Rasters and GeometryOps functions against all the geometry backends for GeoDataFrames |
True, that could go here, and we could actually move a bunch of stuff here from my old GeometryOps pr |
It would be good to have cross package performance benchmarks here, similar to testing in #9
It would be very nice to have a github bot that runs these benchmarks from a comment
@JuliaGeoBot benchmark
in a branch of any package so we can run it when we need, but not in all CI.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: