Plans for v0.14 update #84
Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
|
@JoshuaLampert let me know if there's anything I'm missing above or that you'd like to implement prior to |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I'm very happy with how the internal structure evolved with this breaking release. The implementation looks pretty clean to me. We are also at 99.25 % code coverage now, which is pretty cool 🥳 So v0.14 is good to go from my point of view. I don't have any other breaking changes in mind. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks, and thanks again for all of your inputs, feedback, and brainstorming! Between the last non-breaking refactor PR that got merged into v0.13 and all of these changes, I think the codebase here has been massively improved in quality. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Breaking Changes
IntegrationAlgorithmtoIntegrationRule. Consolidate terminology around integration rules (versus "algorithms", "settings", etc).derivativeandunitdirectionfunctions. Allderivativefunctionality was merged intojacobian.derivativeandunitdirectionfrom exports #88FPto a keyword argument #91FPfrom an optional argument to a keyword argument.FPto a keyword argument #91Non-Breaking Changes
Development/Testing Infrastructure
specializedsource file explaining why each of theseGeometrys requires specialized methods rather than using the generalized ones?@testsetforBezierCurvewith analytic solutions.differentialandjacobianfor Bezier curve integrals #92compatentries.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions