Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Interest in Improving Sentence Tokenization #59

Open
TheCedarPrince opened this issue Jan 18, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Interest in Improving Sentence Tokenization #59

TheCedarPrince opened this issue Jan 18, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@TheCedarPrince
Copy link

Hi @Ayushk4 - I was suggested by @oxinabox and @aviks to ping you.

I am interested in investigating and improving the sentence tokenizers part of WordTokenizers.jl. Would that be of interest to you if I work on a PR regarding this? Thanks!

@TheCedarPrince TheCedarPrince changed the title Interest Improving Sentence Tokenization Interest in Improving Sentence Tokenization Jan 18, 2021
@Ayushk4
Copy link
Member

Ayushk4 commented Jan 18, 2021

I am interested in investigating and improving the sentence tokenizers part of WordTokenizers.jl. Would that be of interest to you if I work on a PR regarding this?

Sure. Contributions are welcome.

I am not familiar with how SpaCy handles sentence splitting. Maybe we could have something similar in this package as well.

Do you have any ideas on how you want to improve the sentence tokenizer? Could you also share some samples (if possible) from your Pdf which weren't working well with these tokenizers.

@sambitdash
Copy link

I think this is one of the authoritative models in this domain.

https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/coli.2006.32.4.485

There may be later ones, but Punkt tokenizer of NLTK is a similar implementation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants