You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Previously with 32-bit comparisons, it would compare the size of each WZ file. For example, here is my comparison of KMS v352 -> v353:
With the changed WZ file structure, it still compares all of the WZ files, but it only shows the size difference for the first WZ partition:
This is the size of the first Skill.wz:
However, I'm not sure if it's better to list each WZ file separately (Skill_000, Skill_001, Skill_002, etc) in the file size comparison, or if it should be the total size.
The one concern I have with listing each WZ file separately is that it would take up a lot of space in the comparison tool.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
KENNYSOFT
added a commit
to KENNYSOFT/WzComparerR2
that referenced
this issue
Sep 20, 2021
Previously with 32-bit comparisons, it would compare the size of each WZ file. For example, here is my comparison of KMS v352 -> v353:
With the changed WZ file structure, it still compares all of the WZ files, but it only shows the size difference for the first WZ partition:
This is the size of the first Skill.wz:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe525/fe525743556da5f0b62cca6345ef5d05e2081913" alt="image"
However, I'm not sure if it's better to list each WZ file separately (Skill_000, Skill_001, Skill_002, etc) in the file size comparison, or if it should be the total size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e86f2/e86f23855d326ccd1e1af2a74264a82f63087d70" alt="image"
The one concern I have with listing each WZ file separately is that it would take up a lot of space in the comparison tool.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: