Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature] Custom Installation Destination for fpkg #29

Open
Cybereu opened this issue Jan 21, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

[Feature] Custom Installation Destination for fpkg #29

Cybereu opened this issue Jan 21, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Cybereu
Copy link

Cybereu commented Jan 21, 2024

I propose an enhancement for Itemzflow, focusing on the installation destination for fpkg files an option to choose between internal storage, extended storage, external HD or NFS etc, maybe similar to the functionality provided by app2usb or through the utilization of symbolic links.

I'm currently facing the challenge of managing a significant collection of PS4 games, totaling 7 terabytes and comprising around 800 games. These games are stored on an external HD that I previously used with my PS4. As I make the transition to the PS5, manually extracting the various pkg files using a pkgextractor has become exhausting. To streamline the process, I created a Python script for automated extraction. However, I'm running out of storage, and the extraction process itself is time-consuming, particularly when dealing with such a large number of games. Managing 800 games has proven to be impractical under these circumstances.

ty !

@Cybereu Cybereu changed the title Custom Installation Destination for fpkg [Feature] Custom Installation Destination for fpkg Jan 21, 2024
@LightningMods LightningMods self-assigned this Jan 23, 2024
@LightningMods LightningMods added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 23, 2024
@LightningMods LightningMods modified the milestone: 1.07 Jan 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants