Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

@hoangtnm Only the metric model's (model finetuned on kitti dataset) output is metric, meaning in meters. The other models output relative disparity (inverse depth) upto an unknown scale and unknown shift which needs to be computed using GT for example #233

Open
ysz-leo opened this issue Oct 20, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@ysz-leo
Copy link

ysz-leo commented Oct 20, 2024

          @hoangtnm Only the metric model's (model finetuned on kitti dataset) output is metric, meaning in meters. The other models output relative disparity (inverse depth) upto an unknown scale and unknown shift which needs to be computed using GT for example

Originally posted by @kishore-greddy in #72 (comment)

@ysz-leo
Copy link
Author

ysz-leo commented Oct 20, 2024

What is the difference between the true depth calculated by relative depth and the true depth output by fine-tuning metric model? Is the result of fine-tuning the model more accurate than the calculated result?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant