Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about the ~/.config/lf/shortcutrc and its purpose #1440

Closed
marciomaiajr opened this issue Oct 28, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Question about the ~/.config/lf/shortcutrc and its purpose #1440

marciomaiajr opened this issue Oct 28, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@marciomaiajr
Copy link

marciomaiajr commented Oct 28, 2024

After years using LARBS I only recently started using lf and I'm finding it a bit more difficulty when compared to Ranger, but I'm still forcing myself to use it, because it's faster.

In the lf config file, it sources a shortcutrc file, but it didn't seems to work, because the shortcutrc maps shortcuts that start with C and E, which are primarily used for copying and extracting. Is there something I'm not understanding about the shortcuts, is there any 'pre-shortcut' that should be used when typing these directories shortcuts? Or maybe there something more profound than that and, as the Nirvana song goes, "maybe I'm just dumb".

Thanks in advance.

@RetroViking
Copy link

Is there something I'm not understanding about the shortcuts

No, you're right. The current configuration is broken. There's already a pull request by @TheYellowArchitect which fixes this by replacing C and E with f and F. I use that setup and it's very convenient. However, fixes can take a long time to be merged. Might be worth reminding @LukeSmithxyz about this particular issue.

@marciomaiajr
Copy link
Author

Thank you very much. I'll close the issue then. I'll check the pull request you mentioned and change my shortcutrc file accordingly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants