Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Precinct name needs clean up #6

Open
joshuakalla opened this issue Jul 28, 2018 · 4 comments
Open

Precinct name needs clean up #6

joshuakalla opened this issue Jul 28, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@joshuakalla
Copy link

joshuakalla commented Jul 28, 2018

I am looking at the precinct names for 2016-precinct-president.csv using Version 9.0 downloaded from https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/LYWX3D. The precinct names for Wood County, Texas are appearing as dates (e.g., 1-Apr) when they should be numeric (e.g., 1-4, see https://elections.mywoodcounty.com/voter-information/precinct-maps/). I believe this is just an Excel issue where certain numbers get reformatted as dates. But how the data was saved in both the CSV and RDA files mean the precinct name is showing up incorrectly. Not sure how widespread this issue is or whether there are other weird Excel reformats.

@jamesdunham
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @joshuakalla, I'd come across this too, and it's fixed for our next release in a couple of days.

As you know, this happens when someone opens and then saves a CSV using Excel. We no longer rely on this kind of manual intervention in our workflow, as a rule, in part for exactly this reason.

@joshuakalla
Copy link
Author

Thanks! And thank you for doing this fantastic public service!

@joshuakalla
Copy link
Author

Another quick question @jamesdunham about the next release: will you be adding more coverage of the State House results from Texas? It looks like there is only coverage for 69 of the 150 seats.

@jamesdunham
Copy link
Contributor

We have precinct returns only for the State House seats in Texas that were contested. They don't seem to be available for unchallenged candidates. I think we'll add the jurisdiction-level (best available) totals instead, for the sake of completeness.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants