Commit c5a40e9
test: pin the peek row iteration limit to one worker
The limit is enforced per worker, so a multi-worker cluster walks the same
rows a share at a time and no single walk reaches it. That made the
assertion depend on the cluster's worker count, and it made the one-shot
query disagree with the indexed view --auto-index-selects wraps it in: the
view holds only the three rows the LIMIT produced, spread across workers,
so it answered where the one-shot query raised. Pin the block to a
single-worker cluster, which is what max_result_size.slt already does for
the same reason.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>1 parent 2ce34f8 commit c5a40e9
1 file changed
Lines changed: 14 additions & 0 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
245 | 245 | | |
246 | 246 | | |
247 | 247 | | |
| 248 | + | |
| 249 | + | |
| 250 | + | |
| 251 | + | |
| 252 | + | |
| 253 | + | |
| 254 | + | |
| 255 | + | |
| 256 | + | |
| 257 | + | |
| 258 | + | |
248 | 259 | | |
249 | 260 | | |
250 | 261 | | |
| |||
280 | 291 | | |
281 | 292 | | |
282 | 293 | | |
| 294 | + | |
| 295 | + | |
| 296 | + | |
283 | 297 | | |
284 | 298 | | |
285 | 299 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments