You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
"The Calculate Depreciation batch job omits fixed assets that use this depreciation method."
Turns out this is not 1000% accurate. In the code unit that calculates depreciation (5611"Calculate Normal Depreciation"), the code first checks for the presence of a Depreciation Start Date, and THEN skips over assets with a Manual depreciation method:
29 TransferValues; //among other things, checks for Depreciation Start Date
30 IF NOT SkipRecord THEN BEGIN //skips record if Depreciation Method is Manual
Assuming there is some good reason for this, it might be better to clarify exactly what conditions a FA Depreciation Book must satisfy to indeed be skipped over. Because clearly there are some. The batch job does not simply skip these records wholesale.
Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.
ID: 9cdaf3fb-428f-4462-9964-e3268828dcc1
Version Independent ID: 299a2c07-58f4-85be-e41b-937f4d94ae63
"The Calculate Depreciation batch job omits fixed assets that use this depreciation method."
Turns out this is not 1000% accurate. In the code unit that calculates depreciation (5611"Calculate Normal Depreciation"), the code first checks for the presence of a Depreciation Start Date, and THEN skips over assets with a Manual depreciation method:
29 TransferValues; //among other things, checks for Depreciation Start Date
30 IF NOT SkipRecord THEN BEGIN //skips record if Depreciation Method is Manual
Assuming there is some good reason for this, it might be better to clarify exactly what conditions a FA Depreciation Book must satisfy to indeed be skipped over. Because clearly there are some. The batch job does not simply skip these records wholesale.
Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: