Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

want to correct 2 sentences in the artical #130

Open
Hangoi opened this issue Nov 19, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

want to correct 2 sentences in the artical #130

Hangoi opened this issue Nov 19, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@Hangoi
Copy link

Hangoi commented Nov 19, 2020

hi

i want to correct 2 points:
1.
"The calculated average cost is then applied to the inventory decreases for the item (or item, location, and variant) with posting dates in the average cost period. If any inventory increases exist that were fixed applied to inventory decreases in the average cost period, then the calculated average cost is forwarded from the increase to the decrease."

is it incorrect in the last sentence?
the right sentence is: "the calculated average cost is forwarded from the decrease to the increase "
2.
image

The scenario number 3 is Negative but in your table It is Positive
the scenario number 4 is Positive but in your table it is Negative


Document Details

Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

@edupont04 edupont04 self-assigned this Nov 24, 2020
@edupont04
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello,
Thank you for your feedback! My colleague who originally wrote this article many years ago is no longer with the company. However, I think he would say that you are not right in your two proposals, but that your confusion is probably caused by the very convoluted wording in the article. I had to read the sentences multiple times, myself, so please bear with me.

  1. The meaning of the sentence is that there in an increase in inventory, and that the average cost must be updated based on the increase. But that the new inventory items are fixed applied to a pre-existing decrease in inventory. I think that is what is meant with "the calculated average cost is forwarded from the increase to the decrease."...

  2. Scenario 3 is about what happens to the Valuation Date field on the value entry if the valued quantity is positive, the posting date is earlier than the latest valuation date of applied value entries, and there is no revaluation. Whereas Scenario 4 is about what happens to the Valuation Date field on the value entry if the valued quantity is negative, and there is a revaluation. Again, the description is convoluted, but I believe it matches the description in the field Help here: https://docs.microsoft.com/previous-versions/dynamicsnav-2016/hh893767(v=nav.90).

@Hangoi
Copy link
Author

Hangoi commented Nov 25, 2020

Hi Eva,

  1. these sentences is your colleague was mentioned about the unit cost of item on Posted sale credit memo that applied direct to Posted Sale invoice, do you agree this with me?
    So the transactions are on Posted sale credit memo are increases in Inventory
    and the transaction are on Posted sale invoice are decreases in inventory
    So when increases are fixed applied to decreases,
    example, the unit cost on Posted sale invoice is $10 --> so unit cost on Posted sale credit memo is $10, is it right?
    the average cost is forwarded from Decrease to Increase ?

2
Scenario 3 is about what happens to the Valuation Date field on the value entry if the valued quantity is positive, the posting date is earlier than the latest valuation date of applied value entries, and there is no revaluation
Could you pls check it one more time? If Scenario 3 is Positive and no Revaluation, so scenario 3 is belong scenario 1, do you agree with me?
Scenario 1 means that all entries type is positive, no revaluation and don't care posting date so Valuation date is always posting date.

Whereas Scenario 4 is about what happens to the Valuation Date field on the value entry if the valued quantity is negative, and there is a revaluation
The function on Item Revaluation Journal do not allow user choosing a negative entries, so do you see the conflict?

@Hangoi
Copy link
Author

Hangoi commented Nov 27, 2020 via email

@edupont04 edupont04 removed their assignment Nov 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants