-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Politics 2.0 The future of Democracy with Decentralised Autonomous Organisation
379 lines (320 loc) · 18.2 KB
/
Politics 2.0 The future of Democracy with Decentralised Autonomous Organisation
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
Politics 2.0
The Future of Democracy with Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs)
Political Parties as DAOs: An Innovative Approach to Democratizing Politics
Abstract
Today's political landscape is marked by complex challenges and a loss of trust in traditional parties. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) offer an innovative concept for renewing democracy and strengthening citizen participation.
Objective:
This paper summarizes the concept of the political party as a DAO and explores its origins and potential.
Methodology:
The paper is based on a literature review and analysis of relevant sources, including academic papers, blog posts, and news articles.
Results:
Concept of Party DAOs: DAOs could improve transparency, accountability, and citizen participation in politics. Tokens enable voting and participation in decision-making.
Origins of the Idea: The idea of party DAOs is based on blockchain technology and the concept of decentralized governance.
Potentials of Party DAOs: Strengthening democracy, promoting policy-oriented politics, combating corruption and abuse of power.
Discussion:
The implementation of party DAOs requires overcoming technical, legal, and societal challenges.
Design of a Political Party as a DAO
Concept
The concept of a political party as a DAO is to create a more transparent, accountable, and participatory form of democracy. DAOs allow members of a party to directly participate in decision-making and governance.
Define Purpose: What should a Party DAO achieve?
The first step in establishing a political party as a DAO is to clearly define its purpose. What should the DAO achieve? Possible goals could include:
Increased Transparency and Accountability: All decisions and financial transactions of the DAO could be stored on the blockchain and visible to all members.
Improved Citizen Participation: Members of the DAO could directly vote on proposals and participate in decision-making.
Democratic Financing of Campaigns: Donations to the DAO could be made via tokens, giving individuals and small groups more influence over politics.
Decentralized Decision-Making: Power would be distributed from a small leadership group to the entire community.
Promotion of Policy-Oriented Politics: DAOs could focus on solving specific problems rather than catering to party lobbies.
Implementation of a Party DAO
The implementation of a political party as a DAO requires consideration of various factors, including:
Token Economy: Definition of the rights and duties of token holders.
Governance Structure: Determination of decision-making mechanisms and roles of members.
Technical Infrastructure: Development of a smart contract and user interface.
Legal Aspects: Compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
Challenges and Opportunities
The implementation of party DAOs presents both challenges and opportunities:
Challenges:
Technical Complexity: Development and use of blockchain technology require technical expertise.
Legal Uncertainty: The legal framework for DAOs is still evolving.
Low Awareness: Many people are unfamiliar with the concept of DAOs.
Opportunities:
Renewal of Democracy: DAOs can lead to a new era of citizen-centric democracy.
Strengthening of Citizen Participation: DAOs enable citizens to actively participate in politics.
Promotion of Transparency and Accountability: DAOs can combat corruption and abuse of power.
Enabling New Forms of Political Collaboration: DAOs can foster collaboration among various stakeholders.
DESIGNING THE DAO STRUCTURE: HOW DOES THE PARTY-DAO WORK?
The structure of a party-DAO needs to be carefully considered to ensure fair, efficient, and transparent governance. Key points include:
Voting Mechanisms: How are decisions made? What voting procedures are used (e.g., simple majority, weighted voting)?
Token Economy: How are tokens distributed, and what rights do they grant? How is it ensured that no single person or group gains too much power?
Board Structure: Is there a board, and how is it elected? What are the responsibilities of the board?
Dispute Resolution: How are disputes between members of the DAO resolved?
Token Plan: The Role of Tokens in the Party-DAO
Tokens play a significant role in a DAO. They can be used for various purposes, such as:
Voting: Token holders can vote on proposals and decisions.
Access to exclusive content or services: Token holders could have access to special events, forums, or other resources.
Funding projects: Tokens could be used to fund projects supported by the DAO community.
It is important to create a token plan that is fair, sustainable, and aligns with the goals of the DAO.
DAO on the Blockchain: Coding in Smart Contract
In the previous blog post, we introduced the concept of the political party as a DAO (Decentralized Autonomous Organization) and highlighted key aspects such as purpose, structure, token plan, and community building.
In this blog post, we take a step further and outline the coding of the first political party as a DAO in a smart contract.
1. Definition of the Core Elements of the DAO:
The smart contract should define the basic properties of the DAO, such as:
Name of the party: The name of the political party should be uniquely identifiable.
Goals and values: The goals and values of the party should be clearly defined and encoded.
Token name and symbol: The name and symbol of the token, which serves to represent voting and administrative rights in the party, should be determined.
Total supply of tokens: The total amount of tokens that can ever be issued should be defined.
2. Implementation of the Governance Structure:
The smart contract should establish the governance structure of the DAO, including:
Voting mechanisms: The manner in which decisions within the DAO are made should be defined. This can include simple majority votes, weighted votes, or other procedures.
Board structure: If a board is envisaged, its tasks, election procedures, and decision-making powers should be established.
Proposal system: A mechanism for submitting and voting on proposals by members of the DAO should be implemented.
3. Token Economy and Token Distribution:
The smart contract should regulate the token economy of the DAO, including:
Token distribution: The way in which tokens are distributed to members of the DAO should be established. This could be through membership fees, active participation, or contributions to the party.
Token rights: The rights associated with owning tokens should be clearly defined. This can include voting rights, access rights to resources, or other benefits.
Token transfer: Rules for transferring tokens between members of the DAO should be set.
4. Integration of External Interfaces:
The smart contract can be connected to external interfaces to enable additional functionalities, such as:
Web interface: A user interface that allows members of the DAO to vote on proposals, manage tokens, and participate in governance.
Integration with social media: Connection to social media platforms to promote communication and information flow within the party.
Integration with other DAOs: Ability to collaborate and interact with other DAOs in the political landscape.
5. Ensuring Security and Compliance:
The smart contract should be developed with high security standards to ensure the integrity of the system and the protection of members' assets.
It is also important to consider legal frameworks and ensure that the smart contract complies with all applicable laws and regulations.
Coding a political party as a DAO in a smart contract is a complex endeavor that requires profound technical and legal expertise.
Programming a Political Party as a DAO with Solidity:
Roles and Permissions: Implementing a role and permission system to define different access levels and responsibilities within the DAO (e.g., members, board members, administrators).
Financial Management: Integrating functions for managing the DAO's financial resources, including income (e.g., donations), expenditures, and budgeting.
Dispute Resolution: Implementing a mechanism for resolving disputes between DAO members, such as through arbitration or governance voting.
Integration with Other DAOs: Enabling interaction and collaboration with other DAOs in the political landscape.
Example code:
```solidity
// SPDX-License-Identifier: UNLICENSED
pragma solidity ^0.8.0;
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol";
contract PartyDAO is ERC20 {
// Roles and permissions
enum Role { Member, BoardMember, Admin }
mapping(address => Role) public roles;
// Financial management
address public treasury;
mapping(address => uint256) public contributions;
// Dispute resolution
address public disputeResolver;
constructor(string memory name, string memory symbol) ERC20(name, symbol) {
// Initial token distribution
_mint(msg.sender, 1000000 * 10**18); // 1 million tokens
// Grant admin role to contract deployer
roles[msg.sender] = Role.Admin;
}
// Function to grant roles
function grantRole(address _account, Role _role) public {
require(roles[msg.sender] == Role.Admin, "Only admin can grant roles");
roles[_account] = _role;
}
// Function to revoke roles
function revokeRole(address _account) public {
require(roles[msg.sender] == Role.Admin, "Only admin can revoke roles");
roles[_account] = Role.Member;
}
// Function to contribute funds to the treasury
function contribute() public payable {
contributions[msg.sender] += msg.value;
}
// Function to withdraw funds from the treasury (requires admin or board member approval)
function withdrawFunds(address _recipient, uint256 _amount) public {
require(roles[msg.sender] == Role.Admin || roles[msg.sender] == Role.BoardMember, "Only admin or board members can withdraw funds");
require(address(this).balance >= _amount, "Insufficient funds");
payable(_recipient).transfer(_amount);
}
// Function to submit a dispute
function submitDispute(address _opponent, string memory _description) public {
require(roles[msg.sender] == Role.Member, "Only members can submit disputes");
// Implement dispute resolution logic here
}
// Function to vote on a dispute (requires board member or admin approval)
function voteOnDispute(uint256 _disputeId, bool _vote) public {
require(roles[msg.sender] == Role.BoardMember || roles[msg.sender] == Role.Admin, "Only board members or admin can vote on disputes");
// Implement dispute voting logic here
}
// Function to execute a dispute resolution (requires admin approval)
function executeDisputeResolution(uint256 _disputeId, address _winner) public {
require(roles[msg.sender] == Role.Admin, "Only admin can execute dispute resolutions");
// Implement dispute resolution execution logic here
}
// ... (other functions and logic)
```
This code snippet represents a basic setup for a DAO with roles, financial management, and dispute resolution features.
1. Implementation of the ERC20 Standard:
To implement the token functions of the Party DAO, we can utilize the ERC20 standard, which defines a set of functions for fungible tokens on the Ethereum blockchain.
```solidity
// SPDX-License-Identifier: UNLICENSED
pragma solidity ^0.8.0;
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol";
contract PartyDAO is ERC20 {
constructor(string memory name, string memory symbol) ERC20(name, symbol) {
// Initial token distribution
_mint(msg.sender, 1000000 * 10**18); // 1 million tokens
}
}
2. Definition of the Governance Structure:
The smart contract should establish the governance structure of the DAO, including voting mechanisms and board structure.
```solidity
// Voting mechanism
mapping(uint256 => Proposal) public proposals;
uint256 public proposalCount;
struct Proposal {
uint256 id;
address proposer;
string description;
uint256 votingDeadline;
mapping(address => bool) hasVoted;
uint256 votesFor;
uint256 votesAgainst;
}
function createProposal(string memory _description) public {
require(balanceOf(msg.sender) >= 100 * 10**18, "Minimum 100 tokens required to create a proposal"); // 100 tokens required
proposalCount++;
proposals[proposalCount] = Proposal({
id: proposalCount,
proposer: msg.sender,
description: _description,
votingDeadline: block.timestamp + 7 days, // 7-day voting period
votesFor: 0,
votesAgainst: 0
});
}
function voteOnProposal(uint256 _proposalId, bool _vote) public {
require(proposals[_proposalId].votingDeadline > block.timestamp, "Voting has ended for this proposal");
require(balanceOf(msg.sender) >= 1 * 10**18, "Minimum 1 token required to vote"); // 1 token required
require(!proposals[_proposalId].hasVoted[msg.sender], "Already voted on this proposal");
proposals[_proposalId].hasVoted[msg.sender] = true;
if (_vote) {
proposals[_proposalId].votesFor++;
} else {
proposals[_proposalId].votesAgainst++;
}
}
function executeProposal(uint256 _proposalId) public {
require(proposals[_proposalId].votingDeadline < block.timestamp, "Voting is still ongoing");
require(proposals[_proposalId].votesFor > proposals[_proposalId].votesAgainst, "Proposal did not pass");
// Implement proposal execution logic here
}
3. Implementation of the Board Structure (optional):
```solidity
// Board structure
address[] public boardMembers;
function addBoardMember(address _member) public {
require(msg.sender == address(this), "Only the contract can add board members");
boardMembers.push(_member);
}
function removeBoardMember(address _member) public {
require(msg.sender == address(this), "Only the contract can remove board members");
for (uint256 i = 0; i < boardMembers.length; i++) {
if (boardMembers[i] == _member) {
boardMembers[i] = boardMembers[boardMembers.length - 1];
boardMembers.pop();
break;
}
}
}
4. Integration of External Interfaces (optional):
```solidity
// Integration with web interface
function getProposals() public view returns (Proposal[] memory) {
Proposal[] memory _proposals = new Proposal[](proposalCount);
for (uint256 i = 0; i < proposalCount; i++) {
_proposals[i] = proposals[i + 1];
}
return _proposals;
}
```
This code provides a foundation for integrating token functionality, governance, and board structures within a DAO framework, allowing for comprehensive management and operation of a political party as a decentralized autonomous organization.
Extensions:
1. Roles and Permissions: Implementation of a role and permission system to control access to certain functions of the DAO.
Solidity
```solidity
enum Role { Member, Proposer, BoardMember }
mapping(address => Role) public roles;
function grantRole(address _account, Role _role) public {
require(hasRole(msg.sender, Role.BoardMember), "Only board members can grant roles");
roles[_account] = _role;
}
function revokeRole(address _account, Role _role) public {
require(hasRole(msg.sender, Role.BoardMember), "Only board members can revoke roles");
roles[_account] = Role.Member;
}
function hasRole(address _account, Role _role) public view returns (bool) {
return roles[_account] >= _role;
}
```
2. Financing: Implementation of a mechanism for financing the DAO through donations and fees.
Solidity
```solidity
address public treasuryAddress;
function donate(uint256 _amount) public {
_transfer(msg.sender, treasuryAddress, _amount);
}
function proposeSpending(uint256 _amount, string memory _description) public {
require(hasRole(msg.sender, Role.Proposer), "Only proposers can propose spending");
proposalCount++;
proposals[proposalCount] = Proposal({
id: proposalCount,
proposer: msg.sender,
description: _description,
votingDeadline: block.timestamp + 7 days,
votesFor: 0,
votesAgainst: 0
});
}
function voteOnSpendingProposal(uint256 _proposalId, bool _vote) public {
require(proposals[_proposalId].votingDeadline > block.timestamp, "Voting has ended for this proposal");
require(balanceOf(msg.sender) >= 1 * 10**18, "Minimum 1 token required to vote");
require(!proposals[_proposalId].hasVoted[msg.sender], "Already voted on this proposal");
proposals[_proposalId].hasVoted[msg.sender] = true;
if (_vote) {
proposals[_proposalId].votesFor++;
} else {
proposals[_proposalId].votesAgainst++;
}
}
function executeSpendingProposal(uint256 _proposalId) public {
require(proposals[_proposalId].votingDeadline < block.timestamp, "Voting is still ongoing");
require(proposals[_proposalId].votesFor > proposals[_proposalId].votesAgainst, "Proposal did not pass");
address payable recipient = payable(proposals[_proposalId].proposer); // Replace with actual recipient logic
recipient.transfer(proposals[_proposalId].votesFor * 10**18); // Assuming proposal amount is in tokens
}
```
3. Schedule: Implementation of a schedule for holding votes and other important events.
Solidity
```solidity
mapping(uint256 => Schedule) public schedules;
uint256 public scheduleCount;
struct Schedule {
uint256 id;
string description;
uint256 startTime;
uint256 endTime;
}
function createSchedule(string memory _description, uint256 _startTime, uint256 _endTime) public {
require(hasRole(msg.sender, Role.BoardMember), "Only board members can create schedules");
scheduleCount++;
schedules[scheduleCount] = Schedule({
id: scheduleCount,
description: _description,
startTime: _startTime,
endTime: _endTime
});
}
function isScheduleActive(uint256 _scheduleId) public view returns (bool) {
Schedule memory schedule = schedules[_scheduleId];
return block.timestamp >= schedule.startTime && block.timestamp <= schedule.endTime;
}
```
4. Quorum: Implementation of a quorum to ensure the validity of votes.
Solidity
```solidity
uint256 public quorumPercent; // Percentage of token holders required to participate for a vote to be valid
function isQu
```
Please note: The following representation is for illustrative purposes only and does not claim to be complete or correct. Implementing a functional Party DAO in a smart contract requires deep expertise in blockchain programming and law.
Milaim Delija
Director of Engineering at Neuronium Engineers