Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add quote from DW to illustrate our point #7

Open
richelbilderbeek opened this issue Mar 6, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Add quote from DW to illustrate our point #7

richelbilderbeek opened this issue Mar 6, 2025 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
low Low priority

Comments

@richelbilderbeek
Copy link
Member

May I quote you on this, from the Q&A document of last clinic
(at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hdyanM4FfSvXl_8G5_jIwt7zx2LZRM6oFaKqBn0P5jc/edit?tab=t.0)?
If yes, how:

'Daniel Wibberg, co-author of [the 2020 paper] and a trainer using this evaluation (personal communication)'
How useful do you think the ELIXIR questions are? How have they helped you improve your course?

Honestly, I haven't found the ELIXIR questions particularly useful
in improving my course.
While they do serve the purpose of collecting numbers for KPIs,
they don't provide the in-depth, qualitative feedback needed
to make substantial course improvements.
The questions focus more on statistical outputs
rather than offering insights into student experiences
or areas for pedagogical enhancement.
As a result, they fall short in helping to identify specific aspects
of the course that could benefit from revision or innovation.

@richelbilderbeek richelbilderbeek self-assigned this Mar 6, 2025
@richelbilderbeek richelbilderbeek added the low Low priority label Mar 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
low Low priority
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant