You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
'Daniel Wibberg, co-author of [the 2020 paper] and a trainer using this evaluation (personal communication)'
How useful do you think the ELIXIR questions are? How have they helped you improve your course?
Honestly, I haven't found the ELIXIR questions particularly useful
in improving my course.
While they do serve the purpose of collecting numbers for KPIs,
they don't provide the in-depth, qualitative feedback needed
to make substantial course improvements.
The questions focus more on statistical outputs
rather than offering insights into student experiences
or areas for pedagogical enhancement.
As a result, they fall short in helping to identify specific aspects
of the course that could benefit from revision or innovation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
May I quote you on this, from the Q&A document of last clinic
(at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hdyanM4FfSvXl_8G5_jIwt7zx2LZRM6oFaKqBn0P5jc/edit?tab=t.0)?
If yes, how:
'Daniel Wibberg, co-author of [the 2020 paper] and a trainer using this evaluation (personal communication)'
How useful do you think the ELIXIR questions are? How have they helped you improve your course?
Honestly, I haven't found the ELIXIR questions particularly useful
in improving my course.
While they do serve the purpose of collecting numbers for KPIs,
they don't provide the in-depth, qualitative feedback needed
to make substantial course improvements.
The questions focus more on statistical outputs
rather than offering insights into student experiences
or areas for pedagogical enhancement.
As a result, they fall short in helping to identify specific aspects
of the course that could benefit from revision or innovation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: