You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There is redundant information being stored in both states, so we should use only the multipleOptions.
This probably only involves adding the chosen and selected field to the MultipleOptions type and changing the uses of optionsList with multipleOptions.
An example of an annoying bug is, for example, when we change the name of an option, it just updates the optionList in the local storage. This results in a bug since we should also update the multipleOptions structure.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There is redundant information being stored in both states, so we should use only the
multipleOptions
.This probably only involves adding the
chosen
andselected
field to theMultipleOptions
type and changing the uses ofoptionsList
withmultipleOptions
.An example of an annoying bug is, for example, when we change the name of an option, it just updates the
optionList
in the local storage. This results in a bug since we should also update themultipleOptions
structure.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: