You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Recent flood events in Texas where RAS2FIM Mapping has been put in place appeared to still be using HAND mapping. We could not find any evidence of RAS2FIM being used in the locations known to be implemented. Since the Flows2FIM will be put in a similar workflow of replacing HAND, this will be a good chance to dig into the system currently in place and ensure its working properly in our live dynamic services.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Check if it was workgin in the older 2.1.7 in Prod. If it is there.. that is a clue. We did not reload ras2fim data at all from 2.1.7 to the 2.18 WIP. Just a column change, so @shawncrawley , maybe check if we have dup column names or a miss match on column names or something with the new model_version field.
Super good to figure that out now between 2.1.7 in prod versus 2.1.8 coming in so we don't duplicate the problem going into the next 2.2. Do we know for sure that 2.1.7 is working?
Recent flood events in Texas where RAS2FIM Mapping has been put in place appeared to still be using HAND mapping. We could not find any evidence of RAS2FIM being used in the locations known to be implemented. Since the Flows2FIM will be put in a similar workflow of replacing HAND, this will be a good chance to dig into the system currently in place and ensure its working properly in our live dynamic services.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: