Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Low performance compared to pix2pix #320

Open
XenMil opened this issue Mar 28, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Low performance compared to pix2pix #320

XenMil opened this issue Mar 28, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@XenMil
Copy link

XenMil commented Mar 28, 2023

Many thanks for the great repository! I've trained both pix2pixHD and pix2pix for an image enhancement task on a rather large dataset (over 30k images, 512x512). Surprisingly, pix2pixHD significantly underperforms compared to pix2pix on all common metrics (MSE, PSNR, SSIM), even after trying to optimize the model and training parameters.

Can you provide any hints as to why this is the case? Is the model unsuitable for this kind of tasks, or should I try any specific parameter values? Any help appreciated!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant