You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think we should add an optional input parameter defining the vertebral levels covered by the acquisition. We can use this to obtain the correlation between the respiratory trace and the field variations, instead of measuring it, as the measurement is often inaccurate.
This only concerns the phase unwrap function.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That is a good idea, both methods can probably coexist. Perhaps we should lay out the logic so that there is a possibility of choosing the most reliable method if both are provided.
I think we should add an optional input parameter defining the vertebral levels covered by the acquisition. We can use this to obtain the correlation between the respiratory trace and the field variations, instead of measuring it, as the measurement is often inaccurate.
This only concerns the phase unwrap function.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: