You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Where WELTRAJ(BRAN) is defaulted to one for the main branch, and only the default value is supported.
For the completions, I think we should rename the keyword to COMPTRAJ instead, so it aligns and replaces COMPDAT, and includes the BRANCH parameter again for multi-segment wells (which will again be defaulted to one for the main branch). So something like this:
I think this will "future proof" the keywords, and give more flexibility. Also the order of the parameters from COMPTRAJ(OPEN) to the end of the keyword should be fixed to match COMPDAT, but the others, apart from the well name, are perhaps more flexible.
Based on your completion keyword (WELCOMPL) then COMPTRAJ (BRAN) will only support the default value of one, COMPTRAJ(REF) will only support the default value of MD, and perhaps COMPTRAJ(COMPL) will only support the default value of one for the time being. Secondly, COMPTRAJ(CONN) and COMPTRAJ(KH) could also be defaulted for the time being with the simulator calculating the values. Finally COMPTRAJ(D) can be ignored as we don't support the gas D-factor for non-Darcy flow (although we should).
What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi David, thank you very much for your suggestions. Adding some extra columns would be easy and indeed keep the tables flexible for the future. I am discussing the changes with @plgbrts .
@goncalvesmachadoc I have a few comments based on your presentation at the OPM Summit 2022 with regards to the propsed two new OPM Flow keywords:
For the WELTRAJ keyword I think we should add a BRANCH parameter so that we can include multi-segment wells at a later date, so something like this:
Where WELTRAJ(BRAN) is defaulted to one for the main branch, and only the default value is supported.
For the completions, I think we should rename the keyword to COMPTRAJ instead, so it aligns and replaces COMPDAT, and includes the BRANCH parameter again for multi-segment wells (which will again be defaulted to one for the main branch). So something like this:
But that means there is noway for the engineers to lump the connections into completions, so perhaps something like this:
I think this will "future proof" the keywords, and give more flexibility. Also the order of the parameters from COMPTRAJ(OPEN) to the end of the keyword should be fixed to match COMPDAT, but the others, apart from the well name, are perhaps more flexible.
Based on your completion keyword (WELCOMPL) then COMPTRAJ (BRAN) will only support the default value of one, COMPTRAJ(REF) will only support the default value of MD, and perhaps COMPTRAJ(COMPL) will only support the default value of one for the time being. Secondly, COMPTRAJ(CONN) and COMPTRAJ(KH) could also be defaulted for the time being with the simulator calculating the values. Finally COMPTRAJ(D) can be ignored as we don't support the gas D-factor for non-Darcy flow (although we should).
What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: