Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Information requiered for Section 2.4 Clark electrode polarographic sensor (SBE43) #95

Open
patricialg opened this issue Oct 5, 2021 · 8 comments
Assignees

Comments

@patricialg
Copy link
Collaborator

I'll look for some basic information contained in sensor manuals (about the sensor, how it works and recomended calibrations). I'll add it to the section so at least we don't have an empty one, but we will need to find experts in case there are some modifications to the manufacturer protocols that will improve the sensor performance.
I'll try to find info for the SBE 43/43F and 63 since in Table 1, all of these sensors are listed.

@patricialg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I added some basic information about Clark sensors. Information from SB webpage ( from manuals and application notes).
Since there is so much in common in this text between 43,43F and 63 (because it´s too general this secion), I changed the name of the section to include all of them.
Is there any photo available? I can try to ask MARS at NOC.

@soerenthomsen
Copy link
Member

Ok so let's keep this issue open until we found a free one but i already merged the text! Thanks Patry!

@soerenthomsen
Copy link
Member

This relates also to #146

@soerenthomsen
Copy link
Member

@evibourma might have an image for this section.

@tomhull
Copy link
Collaborator

tomhull commented Dec 19, 2021

Section, 3.1.4. Clark electrode polarographic sensors is wrong, the SBE 63 is not a polarographic sensor, it's optical and much more like an optode, it should have it's own section (assuming anyone is using these on gliders).
If they're not used on gliders I suggest we don't include them.

@soerenthomsen
Copy link
Member

Thanks a lot @tomhull for clarifying this. I think @evibourma uses this sensor or?

@patricialg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hi @tomhull and @soerenthomsen,
I think we should keep the SBE63 since Spray uses it which brings another question, we don't have any inputs from expert at the moment for Spray. We can add information related to this from articles (e.g. Takeshita et al., 2021 https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/atot/38/2/jtech-d-20-0095.1.xml) at least to keep the basic information about the glider. What do you think?

@soerenthomsen
Copy link
Member

@rtodd-WHOI are you interested to also contribute to this Oxygen SOP and could you or someone from your team provide a picture of a Spray SBE63 integration?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants