diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 2421ac0..111b954 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -2,3 +2,5 @@ node_modules
 .tmp
 .sass-cache
 bower_components
+dist/assets
+dist/images
diff --git a/PULL_REQUEST_REVIEW.md b/PULL_REQUEST_REVIEW.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9032184
--- /dev/null
+++ b/PULL_REQUEST_REVIEW.md
@@ -0,0 +1,309 @@
+# Code Review: PR #1 - Migration from AngularJS to Vue 3
+
+**Pull Request:** [#1 - try code reviewing tools](https://github.com/OlafurTorfi/frisbski/pull/1)  
+**Branch:** `test` → `master`  
+**Status:** ✅ CI Passing  
+**Changes:** 66 files changed, +4507 additions, -2880 deletions
+
+---
+
+## 📋 Summary
+
+This PR represents a **major architectural migration** from a legacy AngularJS application with Grunt/Bower build tooling to a modern Vue 3 single-page application (SPA) built with Vite. The migration successfully modernizes the entire tech stack while preserving the core functionality of the Frisbski website.
+
+### Key Changes:
+- **Frontend Framework:** AngularJS → Vue 3
+- **Build Tool:** Grunt → Vite
+- **Package Manager:** Bower → npm (exclusively)
+- **Testing Framework:** Karma/Jasmine → Vitest
+- **CI/CD:** Travis CI → GitHub Actions
+- **Server:** Updated Express to v5 with ES modules
+
+---
+
+## ✅ What Works Well
+
+### 1. **Clean Architecture**
+- Well-structured Vue 3 components using Composition API (`<script setup>`)
+- Proper separation of concerns (components, views, styles)
+- Clean routing setup with vue-router 4
+- Modern ES module syntax throughout
+
+### 2. **Modern Build Tooling**
+- Vite provides fast dev server and optimized production builds
+- Proper configuration in `vite.config.js` with Vue plugin
+- GitHub Actions CI workflow properly tests and builds the project
+- Node.js 20 requirement clearly specified
+
+### 3. **Code Quality**
+- Consistent code style and structure
+- Semantic HTML with proper accessibility attributes (ARIA labels, roles)
+- Responsive design considerations
+- Good component naming conventions
+
+### 4. **Deployment Ready**
+- Express server properly configured for SPA fallback routing
+- Heroku-ready with `heroku-postbuild` script
+- Static file serving from `dist/` directory
+
+---
+
+## 🔍 Issues & Recommendations
+
+### 🔴 **Critical Issues**
+
+#### 1. **PR Title is Not Descriptive**
+**Issue:** The PR title "try code reviewing tools" does not reflect the significant scope of changes.
+
+**Recommendation:** Update to something like:
+- "Migrate from AngularJS to Vue 3 with Vite"
+- "Modernize frontend stack: Angular → Vue 3, Grunt → Vite"
+
+#### 2. **Missing Migration Documentation**
+**Issue:** No documentation explaining:
+- Why the migration was necessary
+- What functionality was preserved/changed
+- Any breaking changes for users or developers
+- Migration testing approach
+
+**Recommendation:** Add a `MIGRATION.md` or detailed PR description documenting:
+- Functional equivalence verification
+- Testing strategy for the migration
+- Any known issues or limitations
+
+### 🟡 **High Priority Issues**
+
+#### 3. **Minimal Test Coverage**
+**File:** `src/__tests__/smoke.test.js`
+
+**Issue:** Only a trivial smoke test exists. The migration removed all AngularJS controller tests but didn't add equivalent Vue component tests.
+
+```javascript
+describe('smoke', () => {
+  it('runs tests', () => {
+    expect(true).toBe(true)  // Not testing anything meaningful
+  })
+})
+```
+
+**Recommendation:** Add component tests:
+```javascript
+// Example test structure
+import { mount } from '@vue/test-utils'
+import HomeView from '../views/HomeView.vue'
+
+describe('HomeView', () => {
+  it('renders hero section', () => {
+    const wrapper = mount(HomeView)
+    expect(wrapper.find('.heroTitle').text()).toBe('Frisbski')
+  })
+  
+  it('navigates through blog posts', async () => {
+    const wrapper = mount(HomeView)
+    const nextBtn = wrapper.find('[aria-label="Next"]')
+    await nextBtn.trigger('click')
+    // Assert state change
+  })
+})
+```
+
+#### 4. **Deprecated `frameborder` Attribute**
+**File:** `src/views/HomeView.vue:36`
+
+**Issue:** Using deprecated HTML attribute:
+```html
+<iframe frameborder="0" ... />
+```
+
+**Recommendation:** Remove `frameborder` and use CSS instead:
+```html
+<iframe style="border: 0" ... />
+```
+Or add to your CSS:
+```css
+.embedFrame { border: 0; }
+```
+
+#### 5. **Missing `.nvmrc` in Base Branch**
+**Issue:** `.nvmrc` file added in PR but the Node.js version requirement (20) should be documented in the base branch or communicated to the team.
+
+**Recommendation:** Ensure team is aware of Node.js 20 requirement before merging.
+
+### 🟢 **Low Priority / Nice-to-Have**
+
+#### 6. **package-lock.json Size**
+**Issue:** Added 3,790 lines in `package-lock.json`. This is normal but worth noting the dependency tree is now substantial.
+
+**Recommendation:** Periodically audit dependencies:
+```bash
+npm audit
+npm outdated
+```
+
+#### 7. **Unicode Characters in Code**
+**File:** `src/views/HomeView.vue:45, 58`
+
+**Issue:** Using Unicode escapes instead of actual characters:
+```html
+<span aria-hidden="true">\u2039</span>  <!-- ‹ -->
+<span aria-hidden="true">\u203A</span>  <!-- › -->
+```
+
+**Recommendation:** Use actual characters for better readability:
+```html
+<span aria-hidden="true">‹</span>
+<span aria-hidden="true">›</span>
+```
+
+#### 8. **Hardcoded Blog Posts**
+**File:** `src/views/HomeView.vue:70-78`
+
+**Issue:** Blog posts are hardcoded in the component:
+```javascript
+const posts = [
+  { title: 'Blafjoll 3.1.2015 compilation', youtubeId: 'GM2DeCQ7GfU' },
+  { title: 'Naesta Vidjo', youtubeId: null },
+]
+```
+
+**Recommendation:** Consider moving to a separate data file or CMS for easier content management:
+```javascript
+// src/data/posts.js
+export const posts = [ /* ... */ ]
+```
+
+#### 9. **Console Statement in Production Server**
+**File:** `web.js:21`
+
+**Issue:** Using `console.log` in production server:
+```javascript
+console.log(`listening on http://${host}:${port}`)
+```
+
+**Recommendation:** This is acceptable for server startup, but consider a proper logging library for production (e.g., `winston`, `pino`) if the application grows.
+
+#### 10. **Missing Error Handling in Router**
+**File:** `src/main.js`
+
+**Issue:** No error handling for router navigation or component loading failures.
+
+**Recommendation:** Add error handling:
+```javascript
+router.onError((error) => {
+  console.error('Router error:', error)
+  // Handle navigation errors
+})
+```
+
+---
+
+## 🔒 Security Considerations
+
+### ✅ **Good Practices**
+1. ✅ Using `youtube-nocookie.com` for privacy-enhanced YouTube embeds
+2. ✅ Proper use of `aria-hidden` on decorative elements
+3. ✅ No hardcoded secrets or credentials in code
+4. ✅ Dependencies appear to be recent versions
+
+### ⚠️ **Recommendations**
+1. **Dependency Audit:** Run `npm audit` to check for known vulnerabilities in dependencies
+2. **Content Security Policy:** Consider adding CSP headers in production
+3. **XSS Protection:** Ensure all user-generated content (if added in future) is properly sanitized
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 Testing Recommendations
+
+### Manual Testing Checklist
+- [ ] Test all routes: `/`, `/about`, `/rules`, `/404`
+- [ ] Verify YouTube video embeds work correctly
+- [ ] Test blog post navigation (prev/next buttons, dots)
+- [ ] Verify responsive design on mobile devices
+- [ ] Test SPA routing (browser back/forward buttons)
+- [ ] Verify production build serves correctly
+- [ ] Test on multiple browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari)
+
+### Automated Testing Needs
+- [ ] Add unit tests for blog post navigation logic
+- [ ] Add component tests for each view
+- [ ] Add integration tests for routing
+- [ ] Test SPA fallback routing on server
+
+---
+
+## 📦 Deployment Considerations
+
+### Pre-Merge
+1. ✅ CI is passing (tests + build)
+2. ⚠️ Update PR title to be descriptive
+3. ⚠️ Add comprehensive tests
+4. ⚠️ Document migration approach
+
+### Post-Merge
+1. Ensure deployment environment has Node.js 20+
+2. Run `npm ci` instead of `npm install` for reproducible builds
+3. Monitor application for any runtime errors
+4. Verify all routes work in production
+5. Check that static assets load correctly
+
+---
+
+## 💡 Overall Assessment
+
+### Strengths
+- ✅ **Clean, Modern Codebase:** Well-structured Vue 3 components
+- ✅ **Successful Build:** CI is green, application builds successfully
+- ✅ **Good Architecture:** Proper separation of concerns
+- ✅ **Accessibility:** Good use of ARIA attributes
+- ✅ **Modern Tooling:** Vite provides excellent DX and performance
+
+### Concerns
+- ⚠️ **Test Coverage:** Significant gap in automated testing
+- ⚠️ **Documentation:** Missing migration documentation
+- ⚠️ **PR Communication:** Title doesn't reflect scope
+- ⚠️ **Breaking Changes:** Unclear if all functionality preserved
+
+### Verdict
+**Conditional Approval ⚠️**
+
+This is a well-executed technical migration with clean, modern code. However, before merging:
+
+1. **Must Fix:**
+   - Update PR title to be descriptive
+   - Add meaningful component tests (at minimum, test critical user flows)
+
+2. **Should Fix:**
+   - Add migration documentation
+   - Fix deprecated `frameborder` attribute
+   - Verify functional equivalence with old version
+
+3. **Nice to Have:**
+   - Improve code comments where business logic is complex
+   - Consider extracting hardcoded content to data files
+   - Add router error handling
+
+**Estimated Risk:** Medium
+- Large changeset increases merge risk
+- Minimal testing increases regression risk
+- However, clean architecture and passing CI reduce concerns
+
+---
+
+## 🎓 Learning Points
+
+This PR demonstrates excellent practices in:
+1. Modernizing legacy JavaScript applications
+2. Choosing appropriate modern tooling (Vue 3, Vite)
+3. Setting up GitHub Actions CI
+4. Proper Vue 3 Composition API usage
+
+Areas for improvement:
+1. Test-driven migration approach
+2. Documentation of large changes
+3. Incremental migration strategies
+
+---
+
+**Reviewed by:** GitHub Copilot Agent  
+**Review Date:** February 9, 2026  
+**Next Steps:** Address critical and high-priority issues before merging
diff --git a/REVIEW_SUMMARY.md b/REVIEW_SUMMARY.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..03110e7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/REVIEW_SUMMARY.md
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+# Review Summary: PR #1
+
+## Overview
+Completed comprehensive code review of [Pull Request #1](https://github.com/OlafurTorfi/frisbski/pull/1) - "try code reviewing tools"
+
+## What Was Done
+
+### 1. ✅ Code Analysis
+- Reviewed all 66 changed files (+4,507 additions, -2,880 deletions)
+- Analyzed migration from AngularJS/Grunt/Bower to Vue 3/Vite
+- Examined key files: package.json, vite.config.js, Vue components, server code
+- Verified architectural decisions and code quality
+
+### 2. ✅ Testing & Validation
+- Installed dependencies (`npm ci`) - successful
+- Ran test suite (`npm test`) - ✅ passing
+- Built production bundle (`npm run build`) - ✅ successful
+- Started dev server (`npm run dev`) - ✅ working on port 5173
+- Started production server (`npm start`) - ✅ working on port 5001
+- Verified HTML output and routing
+
+### 3. ✅ Security Assessment
+- Ran `npm audit` - ✅ **0 vulnerabilities found**
+- Ran CodeQL security scan - ✅ **no issues detected**
+- Reviewed security best practices (CSP, XSS protection)
+- Verified no hardcoded credentials or secrets
+
+### 4. ✅ CI/CD Review
+- Checked GitHub Actions workflows - ✅ **CI passing**
+- Verified workflow configuration (`.github/workflows/ci.yml`)
+- Confirmed test and build steps execute correctly
+
+## Key Findings
+
+### Strengths
+- ✅ Modern, clean Vue 3 architecture
+- ✅ Successful build and deployment
+- ✅ Zero security vulnerabilities
+- ✅ Passing CI pipeline
+- ✅ Good accessibility practices (ARIA attributes)
+- ✅ Proper ES module usage throughout
+
+### Issues Identified
+1. **Critical:** PR title doesn't reflect scope of changes
+2. **High:** Minimal test coverage (only smoke test)
+3. **High:** Missing migration documentation
+4. **Medium:** Deprecated `frameborder` attribute
+5. **Low:** Hardcoded content could be externalized
+
+## Recommendation
+
+**Conditional Approval ⚠️**
+
+The PR demonstrates excellent technical execution but requires addressing:
+- **Must fix:** Update PR title, add meaningful tests
+- **Should fix:** Add migration docs, fix deprecated attributes
+- **Nice to have:** Extract hardcoded content, add error handling
+
+## Deliverables
+
+1. **PULL_REQUEST_REVIEW.md** - Comprehensive review document with:
+   - Detailed analysis of all changes
+   - Line-by-line issue identification
+   - Security assessment
+   - Testing recommendations
+   - Deployment guidelines
+   - Overall verdict with action items
+
+2. **Validation Results:**
+   - Tests: ✅ Passing (1/1)
+   - Build: ✅ Successful
+   - Security: ✅ No vulnerabilities
+   - Servers: ✅ Both dev and prod working
+
+3. **Clean Git History:**
+   - Removed build artifacts from commits
+   - Updated `.gitignore` to exclude `dist/assets` and `dist/images`
+
+## Security Summary
+
+**No security vulnerabilities found.**
+
+- npm audit: 0 vulnerabilities in 227 packages
+- CodeQL: No issues detected
+- No hardcoded secrets or credentials
+- Privacy-enhanced YouTube embeds (youtube-nocookie.com)
+- Proper security headers recommended for production
+
+## Next Steps
+
+1. Author should review `PULL_REQUEST_REVIEW.md`
+2. Address critical and high-priority issues
+3. Re-run tests after fixes
+4. Consider requesting another review
+5. Merge once issues are addressed
+
+---
+
+**Review Completed:** February 9, 2026  
+**Reviewer:** GitHub Copilot Agent  
+**Status:** Complete with recommendations