Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 24, 2019. It is now read-only.

Evidence metadata may be supported by a well-defined vocabulary. #71

Open
abargnesi opened this issue Jun 3, 2015 · 0 comments
Open

Evidence metadata may be supported by a well-defined vocabulary. #71

abargnesi opened this issue Jun 3, 2015 · 0 comments
Labels
future question ready

Comments

@abargnesi
Copy link
Member

Metadata name/value pairs may exist within a well-defined vocabulary (i.e. RDF Resource). This thought came out of comparison between our enhancements to the experiment_context (#70 #51) part of evidence.

For example, an evidence "Status" may be more useful as a well-defined vocabulary that could be described and validated against. This has the following advantages:

  • Captured and described by the API resources (think /api/annotations, /api/namespaces).
  • URIs as value identifiers (structured vs. unstructured metadata values).
abargnesi pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2015
return only URI for structured annotation
0cd666a 
closes #70

biological_context renamed to experiment_context; closes #51

integrated bel.rb format deserialization into POST /evidence

updated evidence shema to include annotation and namespace references in
a "references" section

TODO work still needed to support structured metadata (refs #71)
@abargnesi abargnesi added the ready label Jun 9, 2015
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
future question ready
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@abargnesi