You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Given the depth of the OpenAI Pydantic classes, I am lead to belive that OpenAI might store the individual tools as their own objects (as opposed to just JSON objects in the Run Steps column) much like the Messages objects. Although this is certainly more organized it adds a high level of complexity. Until there is a strong motive for this we should abstain from subdividing tools, and instead just resort to pydantic for typing and organize things within the backend.
Pros
more modular access to tools
enables evaluation of tool usage
Cons
technical complexity
joins required
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Given the depth of the OpenAI Pydantic classes, I am lead to belive that OpenAI might store the individual tools as their own objects (as opposed to just JSON objects in the Run Steps column) much like the Messages objects. Although this is certainly more organized it adds a high level of complexity. Until there is a strong motive for this we should abstain from subdividing tools, and instead just resort to pydantic for typing and organize things within the backend.
Pros
Cons
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: