OpenADR3.0 support?

[jamesharrow]

It looks like OpenADR3.0 has been published now and uses WebSockets and JSON instead of SimpleHTTP and XML.

Are there any plans to extend this to support OpenADR3.0?
https://www.openadr.org/openadr-3-0

Thanks

[stan-janssen]

OpenADR 3.0 looks like a big step forward for ease of use and modernity. I have no plans at the moment to integrate it into the existing OpenLEADR library because the two are so different that it would make much more sense to create a separate OpenADR 3.0 library for the new stuff.

I currently don't have enough time to get started on this, but I'm happy to work with others to build a package for OpenADR 3. If this is something that you'd like to collaborate on, please let me know.

I think the included Swaggerdoc should get you up and running in the programming language of your choice pretty quickly, but I'm sure there is room for a dedicated implementation like OpenLEADR has provided for the 2.0 version.

Let me know your thoughts!

[axmsoftware]

@stan-janssen @jamesharrow I believe we can start supporting OpenADR 3.0 via a new dedicated set of repositories to that version. I agree that 2.0 and 3.0 are very different. We should continue to support in parallel the Open ADR 2.0 as it is widely adopted.

[juancaoviedo]

Hi,

I would love to have access to an OpenADR 3.0 implementation. I can contribute to the development of the project. However, I do not know where to start. Will it be possible to use the LFE to share this message worldwide to find people/organizations interested in developing the OpenADR 3.0 development support?

@stan-janssen @axmsoftware @jamesharrow how could we proceed?