Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How could external groups use this repo? #49

Open
agstephens opened this issue Aug 19, 2020 · 5 comments
Open

How could external groups use this repo? #49

agstephens opened this issue Aug 19, 2020 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@agstephens
Copy link

Hi @Zeitsperre, your PAVICS-e2e-workflow-tests repo looks like a neat approach.

We do not run PAVICS, but we have various repositories that include Jupyter notebooks. If we wanted to re-use your approach would you propose:

  1. Forking this repo, or
  2. Copying, and reusing, components from the repo?

Thanks

@huard
Copy link
Contributor

huard commented Aug 19, 2020

Hi @agstephens,

@tlvu is the developer and he'll get back from vacation next week. I'm guessing that he'll prefer the first option, and would be happy to accept PR facilitating reuse and configuration.

Maybe we should rename the repo because I don't think we need PAVICS to use this.

@agstephens
Copy link
Author

Thanks @huard, I agree that making it less PAVICS-centric (by name) might make it appeal to a wider audience.

@tlvu
Copy link
Contributor

tlvu commented Aug 25, 2020

@agstephens No problem with rename, how about "Jupyter-notebooks-e2e-tests"?

And yes I'd rather you fork then contribute back.

Can you list me what changes you need, what are your use-cases so I can see how much configurable this should be?

@tlvu tlvu self-assigned this Aug 25, 2020
@agstephens
Copy link
Author

@tlvu thanks for your suggestion. At present we are working to a deadline and focussing our attention in other areas. However, we have an issue noted to come back to this one. Thanks

@tlvu
Copy link
Contributor

tlvu commented May 14, 2024

Related issue roocs/rook#35 and #57

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants