Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] DataLoadTest fails for Pathfinder Core and Pathfinder for GMs #6363

Open
alanshutko opened this issue Aug 22, 2020 · 1 comment
Open
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@alanshutko
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the bug

The DataLoadTest fails on master for Pathfinder.

This began in commit f6c42c6 which added Ultimate Wilderness. PCC:@/pathfinder/paizo/roleplaying_game/ultimate_wilderness/_ultimate_wilderness.pcc contains a forward ref for Psychic Sensitivity from Occult Adventures, but neither UW nor Pathfinder RPG Core Supplements include that product.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. git clone [email protected]:PCGen/pcgen.git
  2. ./gradlew clean build copyToOutput test compileSlowtest datatest pfinttest allReports buildDist

Expected behavior
Unit test passes
Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

pcgen.persistence.lst.DataLoadTest > [2] Pathfinder RPG Core Supplements FAILED
    org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError: Errors encountered while loading Pathfinder RPG Core Supplements ==> expected: <> but was: <Unconstructed Reference: Ability Category FEAT Psychic Sensitivity>

Desktop (please complete the following information):

  • OS: [e.g. iOS]
  • Browser [e.g. chrome, safari]
  • Version [e.g. 22]

Character File
Include a character *.pcg file that can be used to reproduce the issue.

Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.

@alanshutko alanshutko added the bug label Aug 22, 2020
@LegacyKing LegacyKing self-assigned this Oct 25, 2020
@grimreaper
Copy link
Member

fwiw DataLoadTest had another bug which I fixed in #6593 so there may be new warnings shown.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants