Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cubic reference removal from project #306

Open
KneesDev opened this issue Apr 21, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Cubic reference removal from project #306

KneesDev opened this issue Apr 21, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@KneesDev
Copy link

It would be nice if users could easily remove Cubic references from the final ISO export, such as unchecking a "watermark" checkbox.

@KneesDev KneesDev added the question Further information is requested label Apr 21, 2024
@ContractISover
Copy link

You can uncheck "update the release description" and then manually rebrand it by editing config files.

Here are the files you need to edit:

/etc/os-release
/etc/issue
/etc/issue.net
/etc/dpkg/origins/debian (if your using ubuntu then replace "debian" with ubuntu)
/usr/share/base-files/motd

I have a script to do this automatically https://codeberg.org/contractover/Nabatean-gnulinux/src/branch/main/configs.sh

@KneesDev
Copy link
Author

Cubic references remain in the checksum files. Mount the root of your iso and open the md5 text file. You'll see that it mentions how the ISO was made using Cubic.

@ContractISover
Copy link

Cubic references remain in the checksum files. Mount the root of your iso and open the md5 text file. You'll see that it mentions how the ISO was made using Cubic.

Whats wrong in leaving those in? you can make your own md5 checksum if you really want to.

@KneesDev
Copy link
Author

KneesDev commented May 2, 2024

This issue's title is "Cubic reference removal from project". If those are "left in", then it's not a full removal of Cubic references.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants