Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

magic_duckdb based magic? #175

Open
eitsupi opened this issue May 22, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

magic_duckdb based magic? #175

eitsupi opened this issue May 22, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@eitsupi
Copy link
Member

eitsupi commented May 22, 2023

In combination with DuckDB, it seems that magic_duckdb may provide better performance than jupysql.
https://github.com/iqmo-org/magic_duckdb

@max-sixty
Copy link
Member

Yes, looks interesting. I'm not sure whether it's sufficiently mature or not — I notice it's new and has unfinished sentences on the Readme :) (all tools start somewhere!).

The perf does look much better though, I'm surprised the existing approach has so much overhead

@eitsupi
Copy link
Member Author

eitsupi commented May 29, 2023

jupysql is really amazing. This performance issue should be solved...

ploomber/jupysql#470
https://twitter.com/ploomber/status/1661824499224915970
https://github.com/ploomber/jupysql/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md

0.7.5 (2023-05-24)
[Feature] Using native DuckDB .df() method when using autopandas

@edublancas
Copy link

yes, we fixed the performance issue when %autopandas is turned on. And we just started working on ploomber/jupysql#470 to provide further improvements.

If you encounter any performance issues, let us know and we'll fix them!

@max-sixty
Copy link
Member

Thank you @edublancas !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants