Transition routing supports automatic attachment points #18
Labels
feature
New feature or request for enhancement
high-value
Solving this provides large value
medium-effort
4–8 hours of work
What: Allow explicit transition routing to omit explicit first and/or last attachment point, e.g.
viz:pts="- X10 -"
Why: When not many transitions are present on a state, the automatic attachment point is preferable.
This should also greatly help to fix Issue #7.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: