🔍 Have You Searched Existing Issues?
📝 What's wrong with the existing documentation?
Description 📄
After completing recent structural refactors, including:
- Removal of accidental files
- Consolidation of Tailwind configuration
- Centralization of image assets
- Organization of documentation files
The current README.md file structure section may no longer accurately reflect the updated project architecture.
Expected behavior ✅
The README.md should clearly represent the updated project structure, for example:
- backend/
docs/
src/
-- assets/
--- images/
-- components/
-- styles/
tailwind.config.js
package.json
This ensures that new contributors understand the correct project layout.
Actual behavior 🚫
The existing README structure may still reflect the old file organization and not match the updated refactored architecture.
Proposed Solution 💡
- Update the "Project Structure" section inside README.md
- Reflect new folder hierarchy
- Ensure formatting is clean and readable
- Verify that internal documentation links remain valid
Impact 🎯
- Accurate documentation
- Better onboarding experience
- Professional project presentation
- Improved contributor clarity
📎 Supporting Material
No response
🙌 Contributor Checklist
🔍 Have You Searched Existing Issues?
📝 What's wrong with the existing documentation?
Description 📄
After completing recent structural refactors, including:
The current README.md file structure section may no longer accurately reflect the updated project architecture.
Expected behavior ✅
The README.md should clearly represent the updated project structure, for example:
docs/
src/
-- assets/
--- images/
-- components/
-- styles/
tailwind.config.js
package.json
This ensures that new contributors understand the correct project layout.
Actual behavior 🚫
The existing README structure may still reflect the old file organization and not match the updated refactored architecture.
Proposed Solution 💡
Impact 🎯
📎 Supporting Material
No response
🙌 Contributor Checklist