You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
forward_for_simple_bound recognizes the idiomatic pattern (init; i < hi; i++). People familiar with constructive program proving a la Dijkstra et al will write (init; i != hi; i++) when i has been introduced together with an invariant P(i) that generalizes a postcondition P(hi). Perhaps the tactic can be made to handle this pattern too, or at least to give a more helpful hint in this situation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
forward_for_simple_bound recognizes the idiomatic pattern (init; i < hi; i++). People familiar with constructive program proving a la Dijkstra et al will write (init; i != hi; i++) when i has been introduced together with an invariant P(i) that generalizes a postcondition P(hi). Perhaps the tactic can be made to handle this pattern too, or at least to give a more helpful hint in this situation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: