New atomic_evolution signature in ProductFormula subclasses
#13918
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
One or more of the following people are relevant to this code:
|
mrossinek
approved these changes
Feb 25, 2025
| --- | ||
| upgrade_synthesis: | ||
| - | | ||
| The ``atomic_evolution`` argument to :class:`.ProductFormula` (and its |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If you want to be exhaustive, you should also include LieTrotter as a subclass here.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #13858
Summary
Removes the types, the deprecations, and readjust the test.
Details and comments
Probably makes sense that @mrossinek takes a look to this.