We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
For a python library like ours, a 90% coverage threshold should be the ideal. It should already consider the slow tests as well.
Coverage is not the only metric that matters, but it is the best one.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As of today, we have a cc of 87% when considering the slow tests.
Unfortunately, when we exclude the slow tests this number reduced to only 76%.
Ideally, given that RocketPy is a library, code coverage should be of 99.9% with slow tests and 90% without the slow tests
Sorry, something went wrong.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
For a python library like ours, a 90% coverage threshold should be the ideal.
It should already consider the slow tests as well.
Coverage is not the only metric that matters, but it is the best one.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: