Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why don't you submit this package to npm #80

Open
sotarok opened this issue Jan 4, 2017 · 8 comments
Open

Why don't you submit this package to npm #80

sotarok opened this issue Jan 4, 2017 · 8 comments

Comments

@sotarok
Copy link

sotarok commented Jan 4, 2017

Hi,
Thank you for the great library that makes every JS application easier to handle the file uploads.

Anyway, recently there few people using bower to solve their dependencies but use npm (or yarn) directly. So could you submit this library to npm?
That makes us able to describe the dependence on this library directly on package.json.

@Rovak
Copy link
Owner

Rovak commented Jan 4, 2017

Hi @sotarok. I'm working on it in the https://github.com/Rovak/InlineAttachment/tree/dev-3.x branch where i've rewritten the library to ES6 classes. When it's done i will add it to NPM.

@sotarok
Copy link
Author

sotarok commented Jan 5, 2017

@Rovak Thank you for reply me.
That is a good news for me! I can't wait for v3.

@PazzaVlad
Copy link

looking forward to v3 :)

@tony
Copy link

tony commented Apr 10, 2017

Indeed, please publish to npm.

Consider doing it with the current version to upload it now

@Rovak
Copy link
Owner

Rovak commented Apr 10, 2017

hmm will do, haven't had much time to work on v3

@tony
Copy link

tony commented Apr 10, 2017

In my personal circumstance, I vendorized the file in my own repo.

Will v3 offer a pre-built, ES5 compatible version in dist/?

@Rovak
Copy link
Owner

Rovak commented Apr 10, 2017

yes it will

@Rovak
Copy link
Owner

Rovak commented Apr 26, 2017

version 2.0.3 should be available on npm now

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants