Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dataservice protocol list #115

Closed
joachimnielandt opened this issue Apr 19, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

Dataservice protocol list #115

joachimnielandt opened this issue Apr 19, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
type:implementation-evidence Evidence of usage of GeoDCAT-AP

Comments

@joachimnielandt
Copy link

In Flanders we use conformsTo to indicate with which standards the entity complies.

  • there is no universal list of standards available
  • the definition of a standard can be interpreted broadly or narrowly
  • there is a strong connection between standards and typing of an entity, e.g., an entity is of the type registry service if it offers data according to the ISO 19115 standard
class definition / use
Catalogus
Catalogus Record The (metadata) standard to which the main subject of the Catalogus Record conforms.
Dataset A standard, schema, application profile, vocabularium, feature catalogue to which the dataset conforms.
Distributie A standard, schema, implementation model, application profile, vocabularium to which the distribution conforms.
Dataservice A protocol (conform to Protocol, not to Standard) to which the dataservice conforms.

This dataservice protocol list could be of interest to other parties. Would this be beneficial on a European level? Is this already available?

@jakubklimek
Copy link
Contributor

@joachimnielandt See #114 - the INSPIRE list of protocols is linked from there. It seems to be a subset of what you are linking.
I think it might be of interest on a European level, as there is currently no EU NAL for service protocols, only file types.

@joachimnielandt
Copy link
Author

It is important to note that we are linking various entity types to different standards, thereby creating an implicit registry of standards. This does not only encompass the list of protocols.

@jakubklimek
Copy link
Contributor

@joachimnielandt Yes, but this issue is about data service protocol lists, and therefore is connected to the new geodcatap:serviceProtocol property and the INSPIRE Protocol values codelist.

A list of generic standards should be a separate issue, as the governance of such registry of standards will probably be different than a narrowly scoped list of data service protocols.

@jakubklimek jakubklimek added the type:implementation-evidence Evidence of usage of GeoDCAT-AP label May 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type:implementation-evidence Evidence of usage of GeoDCAT-AP
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants