We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SUPERT shows that that top-k is a good way to extract salient sentences to generate pseudo-reference. However, our results show otherwise.
SUPERT shows that extractive heuristics are not good at extracting salient sentences. But how come we are worse than SUPERT?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
SUPERT shows that that top-k is a good way to extract salient sentences to generate pseudo-reference.
However, our results show otherwise.
SUPERT shows that extractive heuristics are not good at extracting salient sentences.
But how come we are worse than SUPERT?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: