Should we add [[ and ]] bindings

[Somelauw]

Problem

At the moment,
[[ mostly behaves like org-backward-element
]] mostly behaves like org-forward-element

These bindings aren't perfect, because if ]] is used on the penultimate element it jumps back instead.

For example

* main heading
** subheading1
** subheading2 (Pressing ]] here goes back to main heading instead of subheading3)
** subheading3

Solution

We can fix this by binding ]] directly to org-forward-element, but since we already have gj and gk for org-forward/backward-element, it might also be an option to bind them to something else.
One idea is to bind [[ to org-previous-visible-heading and ]] to org-next-visible-heading.

Question

What should [[ and ]] be bound to?
Also, what to do with [] and ][?

[Somelauw]

Here is an idea for these bindings:

    "[[" 'org-backward-heading-same-level ; C-c C-b
    "]]" 'org-forward-heading-same-level  ; C-c C-f
    "[m" 'org-previous-visible-heading    ; C-c C-p
    "]m" 'org-next-visible-heading        ; C-c C-n
    "[x" 'org-previous-link               ; C-c C-x C-p
    "]x" 'org-next-link                   ; C-c C-x C-n
    "[v" 'org-babel-previous-src-block    ; C-c C-v C-p
    "]v" 'org-babel-next-src-block      ; C-c C-v C-n

[BlueDrink9]

Would you include [] and ][ for navigating to just inside the header? (I.e. exclusive of the header)?