Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improvements for Zuul documentation #92

Closed
mbuechse opened this issue Oct 19, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #96
Closed

Improvements for Zuul documentation #92

mbuechse opened this issue Oct 19, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #96
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Ops Issues or pull requests relevant for Team 3: Ops Tooling SCS-VP10 Related to tender lot SCS-VP10
Milestone

Comments

@mbuechse
Copy link
Contributor

While working on my Zuul job, I noticed a few potential improvements for the documenation, such as

  • for the encryption command line, replace TENANT by SCS, so the reader doesn't need to investigate the tenant name
  • stress that names should be unique, so maybe people might want to use project-specific "namespaces" (via prefixes or suffixes)

I can do this myself, I just wanted the issue as a reminder. But other people can do it, too, of course.

@mbuechse mbuechse added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Ops Issues or pull requests relevant for Team 3: Ops Tooling labels Oct 19, 2023
@mbuechse mbuechse added this to the R6 (v7.0.0) milestone Oct 19, 2023
@mbuechse mbuechse self-assigned this Oct 19, 2023
@mbuechse mbuechse linked a pull request Oct 20, 2023 that will close this issue
@mbuechse mbuechse added the SCS-VP10 Related to tender lot SCS-VP10 label Oct 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Ops Issues or pull requests relevant for Team 3: Ops Tooling SCS-VP10 Related to tender lot SCS-VP10
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant