Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug]: [Android Beta] Unable to Perform Multiple Consecutive Seeks #1213

Open
mhdzumair opened this issue Feb 20, 2025 · 4 comments
Open

[Bug]: [Android Beta] Unable to Perform Multiple Consecutive Seeks #1213

mhdzumair opened this issue Feb 20, 2025 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@mhdzumair
Copy link

mhdzumair commented Feb 20, 2025

Stremio Platform

Android Mobile Beta App

Describe the bug

Currently, seeking forward or backward multiple times in quick succession is not possible. For example, with a 15-second seek interval, attempting to skip 60 seconds requires four separate interactions. However, after a single seek, the seek buttons become disappear. This makes precise navigation within a video difficult.

To Reproduce

  1. Play a video.
  2. Attempt to seek forward or backward multiple times quickly.
  3. Observe that the seek button becomes disappears after the first attempt.

Expected behavior

Users should be able to repeatedly press the seek buttons (forward or backward) to increment the seek duration. For instance, pressing the forward seek button four times with a 15-second interval should advance the video by 60 seconds.

Screenshots

No response

Desktop (if applicable)

No response

Smartphone (if applicable)

Device: Samsung S22U
Version: 2.0.0-rc.4

TV (if applicable)

No response

Logs

Notes

Implement a similar seeking behavior to the YouTube Android app, where repeated double taps incrementally increase the seek distance.

@mhdzumair mhdzumair added the bug label Feb 20, 2025
@Neelgodly
Copy link

I am facing this too. I have to wait a second and let it move ahead before using the seek button again. I cannot use it multiple times in a row

@hsp1020
Copy link

hsp1020 commented Feb 22, 2025

I very much sympathize. The current method is too inconvenient.

@bully-ur-dad
Copy link

Same here. I've also noticed that skipping back sometimes doesn't bring it back the full amount. For example, if using 10 second seek interval, it will, at times, only go back 1-3 seconds. When using it about 2 minutes ago, I pressed seek backwards 5 times in a row for it to only go back 1 second each time.

@TRtomasz
Copy link
Member

this issue is being worked on will be brought back in next release

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants