You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 30, 2018. It is now read-only.
Currently many of the forest levels contain ice jumpys and ice spikys, which melt.
This does not fit the theme of the forest.
Should they be different to ice jumpys? (to make it more interesting)
Should they be named differently? (in code and in level files)
New artwork (including sleeping spiky)
Implementation in code (if needed)
Implementation in levels @SuperTux/level-designers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Just note that it's useless to create a new factory when the object's behaviour is the same as an existing objects and just a little detail is changed. So when it's supposed to behave the same way as jumpy, it should be still jumpy in the level files.
@Rusty-Box Then that's wasted code (annoying to maintain and the more lines of code, the more likely a bug) and needs to be fixed.
In re behavior: there could be ghost variants of them (not sure what will be special about them but you could suggest that) and some filled with lava (iceflame needed; for castles).
@Karkus476 It already recognized based on which action is defined. For example, kirby is a snowball, but doesn't melt, because a burning action is defined.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Currently many of the forest levels contain ice jumpys and ice spikys, which melt.
This does not fit the theme of the forest.
Should they be different to ice jumpys? (to make it more interesting)
Should they be named differently? (in code and in level files)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: