Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Idea; tilemap editor improvments #3166

Open
Frostwithasideofsalt opened this issue Jan 3, 2025 · 4 comments
Open

Idea; tilemap editor improvments #3166

Frostwithasideofsalt opened this issue Jan 3, 2025 · 4 comments
Labels
category:design good first issue Good for first-time contributors involves:editor status:needs-discussion Team member and developers need to discuss of decisions type:idea

Comments

@Frostwithasideofsalt
Copy link
Member

  1. have a button that lets the player duplicate tilemaps. this would be very useful for tilemaps on pathts.
  2. make tilemap icons look different based on properties.
    icon concepts:
    image
    image

alt
image

@MatusGuy MatusGuy added involves:editor type:idea status:needs-discussion Team member and developers need to discuss of decisions category:design labels Jan 3, 2025
@MatusGuy
Copy link
Member

MatusGuy commented Jan 3, 2025

I vouch for the icons, that's for sure

@Frostwithasideofsalt
Copy link
Member Author

would it be too much to make solid + lightmap icons? it feels very unneeded but it may be nice to have them just for the sake of completion

@bruhmoent
Copy link
Member

Great idea

@Frostwithasideofsalt
Copy link
Member Author

for a more important question. should the nonsolid tilemap icons have the blue tint or no?

@Vankata453 Vankata453 added the good first issue Good for first-time contributors label Jan 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
category:design good first issue Good for first-time contributors involves:editor status:needs-discussion Team member and developers need to discuss of decisions type:idea
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants