Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Leaderboard for heterogeneous graphs is missing #435

Open
amblee0306 opened this issue Sep 23, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Leaderboard for heterogeneous graphs is missing #435

amblee0306 opened this issue Sep 23, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@amblee0306
Copy link

In the Simple-HGN code's README (https://github.com/THUDM/CogDL/tree/master/examples/simple_hgn), it mentioned that there is a leaderboard but the link is not working. Do you know where I can find this heterogeneous graphs leaderboard?

@cenyk1230
Copy link
Member

Hi @amblee0306 ,

You can find the cogdl leaderboard from this link. If you want to see the original repo of Simple-HGN, please check this link

@amblee0306
Copy link
Author

Hi @cenyk1230

Thanks for your reply, the leaderboard stated that the models were evaluated using macro-f1 scores, can I check how can I change the code such that the macro-f1 scores are returned? Currently when I run the simple-hgn from cogDL, I believe the test_acc is being utilized instead.

@cenyk1230
Copy link
Member

Hi @amblee0306 ,

It seems that the results in the leaderboard should be micro-f1 scores (the same as accuracy in the multi-class setting) rather than macro-f1.

@amblee0306
Copy link
Author

amblee0306 commented Sep 25, 2023

Hi @cenyk1230

Yes indeed. I would like to get the macro-f1 scores as well. Do you have any advice on how that is possible? Also, the score on the leaderboard, is it only for one instance or it refers to the average micro-f1 score? Cause I ran 10 instances and the average was lower than what was mentioned on the leaderboard.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants