Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
AVX was introduced in sandy bridge, which was already 11 years ago. The executables can run in CI/CD VMs, so I think it is probably safe to enable it. AVX support is not tied to any specific linear algebra driver, it is enabled by default when compiling the application, and it can be turned off by assigning For openBLAS or MKL, there is no requirement at all. The current openBLAS is configued using
If you are able to compile the application by yourself, you can build your own version of openBLAS, drop both If you are looking for an openBLAS version, it is already there, but with AVX enabled. Anyway, it is not a bad idea to ship non-AVX versions. I may do it in the next release. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
And yes, solving matrices is likely to be memory bandwidth bounded. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
right, AVX is an old. however some processor type did not support e.g celeron. another FE software still usable on my second pc with 16GB memory, it's a CalculiX with PaStiX solver running multipart contact, plasticity and large deformation just below an hours. many thanks to consider additional executable distributions without AVX activated, given wide range opportunity to many user or student to learn and use SuanPan. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
dear Developer,
many thanks for such a great software application with GPL distributions.
Windows OS commonly used by many student, but the processor and generation may vary. is it possible to use another library solver? even only to be familiar and exploring SuanPan capabilities to solved a small or moderate models.
to my understanding FE most depend on memory, so i suggest to distribute executable for windows without AVX dependencies, hope openBlas is not hard to integrated.
best regards,
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions