Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chore: Remove !wsl and /wsl? #637

Open
1 task
MaoShizhong opened this issue Dec 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
1 task

Chore: Remove !wsl and /wsl? #637

MaoShizhong opened this issue Dec 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
Status: Needs Review This issue/PR needs an initial or additional review

Comments

@MaoShizhong
Copy link
Contributor

Checks

  • I have thoroughly read and understand The Odin Project Contributing Guide
  • The title of this issue follows the command name: brief description of request format, e.g. /help: add optional @user parameter

Do you want to be assigned to this issue?

  • I would like to be assigned this issue to work on it

Description of the Feature Request

!wsl and /wsl were useful when WSL support was first introduced. It's now been long enough that a dedicated command just to direct people to #wsl-help isn't necessary anymore, and it hasn't been used for a long time outside of people discovering it in #bot-spam-playground.

Can these be removed?

Acceptance Criteria

Tasks

Preview Give feedback

Additional information

No response

@MaoShizhong MaoShizhong added the Status: Needs Review This issue/PR needs an initial or additional review label Dec 12, 2024
@MaoShizhong
Copy link
Contributor Author

MaoShizhong commented Dec 13, 2024

Side note, I haven't noticed or found much if any use of !google nor !searchtop for a long time. Their slash equivalents /search google and /search top do see good use. I wonder if one or both of them may also be considered for pruning? The other legacy ! commands still see good inline use.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Needs Review This issue/PR needs an initial or additional review
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant