You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I wanted to generalize the tutorial's code a bit so that cluster 2D-cluster centroids could possess unconstrained components. In the tutorial the x- and y- components are constrained to be equal. In the tutorial this is achieved by using only a 1D-parameter vector $\mu = [-3.5, 0.5]$. I rewrote the code only a tiny bit so that these equality constraints are avoided. Now, I have replaced the 1D-vector $\mu = [-3.5, 0.5]$ by one DxK array with cluster centroids as column vectors. Despite all my code tinkering I were not successful in the identification of the two clusters. Now I want to ask you whether you could modify your tutorial code so that the equality constraint in $\mu-$components is avoided. Then it would be possible to run the algorithm with the Old Faitful data set so that a comparison with results of EM algorithm (cf. Bishop, 2006, p.437, Fig 9.8) is possible.
A second issue is that I cannot install Turing.jl v0.30.5. My configuration is Win11 and
Hi,$\mu = [-3.5, 0.5]$ . I rewrote the code only a tiny bit so that these equality constraints are avoided. Now, I have replaced the 1D-vector $\mu = [-3.5, 0.5]$ by one DxK array with cluster centroids as column vectors. Despite all my code tinkering I were not successful in the identification of the two clusters. Now I want to ask you whether you could modify your tutorial code so that the equality constraint in $\mu-$components is avoided. Then it would be possible to run the algorithm with the Old Faitful data set so that a comparison with results of EM algorithm (cf. Bishop, 2006, p.437, Fig 9.8) is possible.
I wanted to generalize the tutorial's code a bit so that cluster 2D-cluster centroids could possess unconstrained components. In the tutorial the x- and y- components are constrained to be equal. In the tutorial this is achieved by using only a 1D-parameter vector
A second issue is that I cannot install Turing.jl v0.30.5. My configuration is Win11 and
[31c24e10] Distributions v0.25.107
[7876af07] Example v0.5.3
[1a297f60] FillArrays v1.9.3
[c3e4b0f8] Pluto v0.19.38
[f3b207a7] StatsPlots v0.15.7
[fce5fe82] Turing v0.30.4
Thanks in advance, Claus Möbus
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: