You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It currently has the data normally distributed around the ODE solution. However, given that this is an ecological model, one would never actually observe negative densities or counts of animals in the wild. (The existence of atto-foxes is problematic enough without positing the existence of theoretical anti-foxes...) Would it make sense to make the data and observation distributions Poisson counts instead? I just tried it out and the model still converges easily.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
yebai
transferred this issue from TuringLang/Turing.jl
Jun 6, 2024
A question/suggestion on this example: https://github.com/TuringLang/Turing.jl/edit/master/docs/_tutorials/10_bayesian-differential-equations.md
It currently has the data normally distributed around the ODE solution. However, given that this is an ecological model, one would never actually observe negative densities or counts of animals in the wild. (The existence of atto-foxes is problematic enough without positing the existence of theoretical anti-foxes...) Would it make sense to make the data and observation distributions Poisson counts instead? I just tried it out and the model still converges easily.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: