Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

The approach of WARP is to build a common format for this sort of thing, we do intend to add a fuzzy matching system as you describe however it should be noted that the intention of WARP was to replace SigKit, and as such it needs to run the entire available dataset on all functions automatically which limits the amount of time we can spend. The fuzzy matching likely will, like the network component of WARP, require user interaction (atleast in the default settings).

You will want to follow the issue #6105 for updates, it is definitely high on our TO-DO list as indicated by the number of 👍 and user feedback.

Replies: 2 comments 1 reply

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@emesare
Comment options

Answer selected by emesare
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
2 participants
Converted from issue

This discussion was converted from issue #7493 on October 18, 2025 20:38.