Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Belt Tension shouldn't be buried in Secondary Tuning #370

Open
mizz141 opened this issue Jun 29, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Belt Tension shouldn't be buried in Secondary Tuning #370

mizz141 opened this issue Jun 29, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@mizz141
Copy link

mizz141 commented Jun 29, 2023

Pretty much as the title says, there are quite a lot of people on the discord who simply disregard belt-tension since it's "a secondary tuning step" and "I've been printing fine so far" that they either completely ignore belt-tension or realize it way too late and already have broken their belts.

Especially now with Tap gaining popularity, there's been cases where people have even ripped their TAP mounts because the belts were too tight.

In my opinion, belt-tension should be moved from the Secondary printer tuning, into the initial startup check, below "verify heaters" this would then entail that after the heaters are checked, and before any movement occurs, the belts will be of proper tension.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant