Replace Wyam documentation with Statiq

[AdmiringWorm]

Wyam documentation was recently added, but the long term goal will be to replace the documentation generated by Wyam with Statiq.

This is probably something I would need help with to achieve

[gep13]

This is something I would like to get into Cake.Recipe as well, assuming this makes sense.

[AdmiringWorm]

I think it would make sense to get that into Cake.Recipe at some point as well.
Not sure how that would work though, as Statiq seems a bit more modular (maybe not the right word), and relies more on what the user has configured rather than having specific arguments like the wyam executable have.

[gep13]

This is the thing that I am not sure about, and haven't dug into. I think the idea is that there is going to be pre-baked packages that will mean Statiq can be used in the same way that Wyam is today, but would need to check with @daveaglick to confirm.

[daveaglick]

I haven't totally decided whether Statiq Web and Statiq Docs will ship global tools (it doesn't make sense to ship one for Statiq Framework since that's more of a framework than anything with in-the-box functionality). Either way, we should be able to get an integration going. If a global tool ships then it can be called by forking a process like Wyam is now. If not, then it would be fairly easy for the Cake script to "embed" Statiq Docs and run it in-process. I've also got an idea in the back of my mind that we could make a Statiq-Cake bridge so that when running Statiq from Cake you could pass in the current Cake environment and Statiq would use it.

Anyway, that's all down the road. The more immediate goal is to start work on Statiq Docs (the equivalent of the Wyam docs recipe). Hoping to get that underway any day now.

[gep13]

@daveaglick all of this sound great! Looking forward to checking it out when the pieces are ready. This is definitely something that we will want to get into Cake.Recipe once it is ready.