You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Without staging optimization, RBNF seems to be much slower than original CPython parser(with CPython parser, import sklearn costs 2~3 seconds, and RBNF costs almost 10 seconds).
Staging optimization makes RBNF very fast, however a huge startup overhead makes it useless.
To release a version with friendly compiler services, we try to figure a way to perform JIT techniques on bottom-up parser generator and reduce the overhead of wrapping Python interfaces.
Without staging optimization, RBNF seems to be much slower than original CPython parser(with CPython parser,
import sklearn
costs 2~3 seconds, and RBNF costs almost 10 seconds).Staging optimization makes RBNF very fast, however a huge startup overhead makes it useless.
To release a version with friendly compiler services, we try to figure a way to perform JIT techniques on bottom-up parser generator and reduce the overhead of wrapping Python interfaces.
https://github.com/thautwarm/rbnfrbnf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: